Monday, August 10, 2015

Debunking the myths about Party Candidates and Independent Candidates


Some people think that independent candidates are working all by themselves and are very limited manpower and that therefore, they may not be able to run a town council. They even think that conversely, political parties and party candidates have better resources and are better able to run town councils. If we care to think deeper, these are merely assumptions and are not absolute truths.


Political parties and party candidates cannot merely rely on the identity of their organisation alone to reach out to voters. There is physical work to do - reaching out to people and engaging them and for all these you need supporters and various resources. Identity alone as a registered political party is not going to make things work which is why some registered political parties are unable to function at all or do so effectively.


As a potential independent candidate, I do not come under any party banner. This is by my own choice. I do not have a party identity but rely on my own identity. I am what you see and but not everything you see. I am not a one-man show and do not do everything by myself. Behind me, I have a strong team of supporters who are dedicated to help me in my candidacy.


As you would have noticed, I have done substantial groundwork. The amount of work that I have been able to do on the ground and so extensively speak for themselves. It would not have been possible without the support of my team of supporters.


As a matter of fact, when news of my departure from the National Solidarity Party was released, various political parties were quick to invite me to join them. Besides knowing the extent and quality of my work, they are also interested in the support that I have in terms of manpower and resources. The fact is that, with my team of supporters, I am in a position to compete against any party candidate standing for election in any single-member constituency and run a town council. 


I will, however, emphasis that not all independent candidates come from the same mould. The supporting manpower and resources would be different for each of them. People should not discount an independent's potential simply because he has no political party to fall back on but should judge them by their work. My team functions like a party machinery and after the elections, there are plans to register a political party to provide a platform and support for those who prefer to be party candidates and subscribe to Peolitics.


We should be able to see the difference between form and substance when comparing party candidates with independent candidates. And you will be able to appreciate that some independent candidates may indeed be substantially better than party candidates.

Sunday, August 9, 2015

THEME: Education - Building a Nation on Values

Every educational system must be grounded on a strong educational philosophy. What is our educational philosophy?


It may be important for schools to teach our students the job-skills and to train them to be ready for the workforce but without an early grounding in moral values that bind our families and community together, the knowledge and skill-sets that the students acquire will serve only to meet the demands of building an economy but not the building of a nation. Think of the difference between chemical farming and organic farming.

The early educational system that we had after independence was like organic farming. A great deal of emphasis was placed on teaching civics and students were inculcated with a love of learning for the sake of acquiring knowledge to become a useful person in society. They received instructions on important virtues such as filial piety, patriotism, parental obedience, respect for elders and teachers and consideration for others. Lessons on these values were drawn from historical persons and from literature. Until today, many older generation Singaporeans who have been through the early educational system continue to hold these values dearly and they have a strong community spirit.


However, with the passage of time and the short stints of subsequent education ministers, our school curriculum was repeatedly revised and some important subjects that contained elements of human values and relationships fell out of favour. Our educational system began to function like the rigours of chemical farming. There was strong emphasis on school rankings, high scores and competing for places in top schools. Principals termed themselves CEOs and parents were regarded as customers encouraging parents to behave without respect for teachers' authority over their students. Students were fed a heavy dosage of subject-based knowledge with little or negligible focus on strengthening their value systems. With the social problems that now threaten to weaken family and commune bonds, there is a pressing need for schools to reintroduce and re-focus on subjects that enable students to appreciate human values and relationships, such as history and literature.

Parents should also learn to appreciate that educating their children is for the sake of enabling them to become useful citizens and not for the selfish goal of attaining monetary rewards. This parenting education will impart good parenting skills that will reinforce the values that their children will be taught in school. Leaders should set examples by demonstrating the values that are being taught to our children. Wisdom, humility and benevolence are all the hallmarks a great leadership. Leaders should demonstrate that they are able to make self-sacrifices for the good of he people and nation. They lose moral authority and respect when they are perceived as over-paying themselves when serving the nation..


Communal education is just as important. A community that learns to accept that the most important aspect of receiving an education lies in the children learning self-discipline and self-sacrifice. Free talks and seminars by learned scholars in the field of morality and ethics should be promoted to become a regular feature in our community clubs so that people can constantly seek advice and clarifications on how to effectively communicate with each other and to amicably resolve interpersonal and communal issues.

In the heart of education are our teachers. We need to give them respect and authority to discipline students. We need teachers who are not only good at teaching subjects but are able to help our students construct a value system that will strengthen relationships within families and communities. Teachers should adopt a value-based educational philosophy and those who have demonstrated high moral values should be appointed to lead.

Let's move to become a nation of values by building a strong value-based educational system. Only by doing so can we hope to achieve greater progress as a people and a great nation.

Friday, August 7, 2015

Remembering Lee Kuan Yew (1923 - 2015)


History makes man and man makes history. Whether you like him or not, Lee Kuan Yew ("LKY") made a part of Singapore's history. In fact, Singapore's history of independence began with him.

Looking back at the period from 1965 to 1990, when LKY was prime minister, one feels great pride in Singapore's tremendous progress as a country and nation in that time. The economy grew substantially and a strong national identity emerged. Though he had his critics and was considered paternalistic and high-handed, especially in matters concerning national security and politics, he was the man who steered Singapore to become an international financial centre and the little red dot that everyone came to knw.

We do not have to love LKY but we must give him credit for the positive work that he did for Singapore. In Chinese, there is a saying ”没有功劳也有苦劳“ which means that even if he had not done any meritorious deed, he had performed his work with elbow grease.

And many will agree that during his tenure as prime minister, he had done well overall notwithstanding disagreements over some of his policies. There can be debate over the prudence of some of his unpopular policies but we cannot deny that he had many good policies too. The Chinese saying "功不可没" which means "we cannot bury the credit due to him" applies to LKY for his contributions to Singapore.

He deserves to be remembered and not forgotten.